Resources for Data Users
Data cleaning pipeline and guidelines
We have created a data cleaning pipeline in the form of a Python library, which can be used to clean the accompanying clinical data to the images. This will help with:
- Correcting format errors
- Removing anomalous data
- Remapping categorical values to standardised categories
- xtracting values embedded within strings
- Merging data under old or mis-typed column headers into the new/correct fields
- Standardising the scales of some clinical variables
In addition, we have created guidelines for interpreting the clinical data, compiled in this spreadsheet. This will help with:
- Understanding what the expected data format is for each field
- Highlighting where there are known erroneous entries for each field
- Recommending remedial actions for erroneous entries within each field
An additional spreadsheet contains information on submitting sites that use measurement units for various clinical variable fields that is different from the overview of the above schema description. This will help with:
- Transforming clinical measurements on the same range
Please note that this sheet contains only a subset of potential submitting centres, and a subset of clinical variables. Furthermore, responses for these submitting centres may only represent a subset of their hospital sites, where units might vary from hospital to hospital. The information presented here should only serve as a guide, and always be checked against values to ensure they are sensible. For some fields you might have to make decisions on data cleaning and potentially drop values that you think are outside the plausible range or entered incorrectly.
Frequently Asked Questions
This is a list of Frequently Asked Questions with regards to the NCCID dataset content and usage. Feel free to suggest new entries!
How often is new data uploaded to the database?
It varies but we are aiming for a new data release every week.
What is the "Final COVID Status" determined by? We're seeing patients with two negative PCRs with a positive final COVID status.
The Final COVID Status is the final status that is available for each patient. The fact that there are patients with multiple negative swab results and the final status which is positive is an example of what happens sometimes in practice: patients might get tested several times producing negative results, and then finally result positive. This might be because sometimes tests are not accurate or because patients fell ill between the initial and the final test.
Is COVID CODE = Normal the equivalent of "regular" Covid-19 or is it non-Covid-19?
COVID CODE = Normal refers to the cases where the X-Rays do not show
signs of Covid-19, this might be because the patient does not have it or
because the patient has only very mild symptoms.
What are the CXR severity scores?
The severity scores associated with the chest X-Ray studies are subjective descriptions provided by the radiologist reviewing the images, on a scale of three severity levels (Mild = 1, Moderate = 2, Severe = 3).
Is the CXR severity score only available for the first two X-Ray studies?
Yes,the severity information is only available for the first two X-Ray studies for each patient.
How can I match the clinical data points to the corresponding imaging scan?
The temporal information should help you match the information in the
sheet with the relevant imaging study:
Date of 1st CXR and
Date of 2nd CXR are the dates in which the first two X-Ray scans were
taken and correspond to the two severity values, the time information in
the X-Ray's DICOM should then allow you to identify the imaging scans
that match with those dates.
Date format seems to be inconsistent across date variables (some are in US format and some are in UK format). Why is this? Is there a pattern?
Yes, it is true that the date format is not consistent across all variables, but it should be consistent within each single variable (i.e. if it is UK format, all entries for that variable are in UK format).
The dates of the Date of acquisition of 1st RT-PCR and Date of
acquisition of 2n RT-PCR are in US format, however we have seen there
are a few instances where some sites have inputted additional text in
these fields which will require a small amount of cleaning (e.g.
Date of 1st CXR with value
[TEXT] - 2020-03-27).
All other dates should be in UK or ISO format.
Have any of the dates been changed systematically as part of the anonymisation process? Or are the dates in the DICOM files and the clinical variables the actual dates of scans and tests?
Most dates in the DICOM files have been offset. The excludes the Acquisition date (if present) and the Study Date, so these can be used to identify the time of scan. In addition, the patient's DOB has been reset to the year of birth followed by 0101. The dates in the clinical data have not been touched.
There are cases where patients have multiple JSON files. Why is this? Which one is the correct one?
Situations with patients who have multiple JSON files can occur when the sites that contribute data to NCCID have uploaded data, then revised/corrected and then re-uploaded it. We are not currently over-writing files, as it would make data management harder. We suggest that for each patient you utilise the latest JSON file that you have available.
Finally, there can also be cases in which the same patient went to two different hospitals, and for which images have been received from two centres separately. In similar situations, the older JSON files should be considered.
How can I combine the clinical data into a single table/dataset, selecting only the most recent "data" and/or "data" files for each patient?
The development team prepared a tool to help you to aggregate JSON metadata and convert the results to CSV files. Please check this repository, where the README contains all the relevant information and the relevant download links.
How do I tell if the clinical data files are for positive and negative patients?
There are two files, with
data in the filename, that can
be used to differentiate between Covid-19 positive and negative
patients. Negative patients only have a
status file, this is because
data providers were told to only submit the minimum information for the
control cohort, to make it easier for them. Positives can be identified
by the presence of a
data file which contains relevant clinical
information, such as their medical history. Some positive patients will
have both files, but their status file can be ignored.